GW

Parameters needed to set up a GW calculation for electronic level energies of molecules and the band structure of materials (currently only 2D materials tested). For the GW algorithm for molecules, see https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01282. For 2D materials, see http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16066. [Edit on GitHub]

Subsections

• PRINT

Keywords

• SECTION_PARAMETERS

• APPROX_KP_EXTRAPOL

• CUTOFF_RADIUS_RI

• EPS_FILTER

• HEDIN_SHIFT

• MEMORY_PER_PROC

• NUM_TIME_FREQ_POINTS

• REGULARIZATION_RI

Keyword descriptions

SECTION_PARAMETERS: logical = F

Lone keyword: T

Controls the activation of the GW calculation. [Edit on GitHub]

APPROX_KP_EXTRAPOL: logical = F

Lone keyword: T

Usage: APPROX_KP_EXTRAPOL

If true, use only a 4x4 kpoint mesh for frequency points \(\omega_j, j \ge 2\) (instead of a 4x4 and 6x6 k-point mesh). The k-point extrapolation of \(W_{PQ}(i\omega_j,\mathbf{q})\) is done approximately from \(W_{PQ}(i\omega_1,\mathbf{q})\). [Edit on GitHub]

CUTOFF_RADIUS_RI: real = 3.00000000E+000 [angstrom]

Usage: CUTOFF_RADIUS_RI 3.0

Mentions: ⭐Electronic band structure from GW

The cutoff radius (in Angstrom) for the truncated Coulomb operator. The larger the cutoff radius, the faster converges the resolution of the identity (RI) with respect to the RI basis set size. Larger cutoff radius means higher computational cost. [Edit on GitHub]

EPS_FILTER: real = 1.00000000E-008

Usage: EPS_FILTER 1.0E-6

Mentions: ⭐Electronic band structure from GW

Determines a threshold for the DBCSR based sparse multiplications. Normally, EPS_FILTER determines accuracy and timing of low-scaling GW calculations. (Lower filter means higher numerical precision, but higher computational cost.) [Edit on GitHub]

HEDIN_SHIFT: logical = F

Lone keyword: T

Usage: HEDIN_SHIFT

If true, use Hedin’s shift in G0W0, evGW and evGW0. Details see in Li et al. JCTC 18, 7570 (2022), Figure 1. G0W0 with Hedin’s shift should give similar GW eigenvalues as evGW0; at a lower computational cost. [Edit on GitHub]

MEMORY_PER_PROC: real = 2.00000000E+000

Usage: MEMORY_PER_PROC 16

Mentions: ⭐Electronic band structure from GW

Specify the available memory per MPI process. Set MEMORY_PER_PROC as accurately as possible for good performance. If MEMORY_PER_PROC is set lower as the actually available memory per MPI process, the performance will be bad; if MEMORY_PER_PROC is set higher as the actually available memory per MPI process, the program might run out of memory. You can calculate MEMORY_PER_PROC as follows: Get the memory per node on your machine, mem_per_node (for example, from a supercomputer website, typically between 100 GB and 2 TB), get the number of MPI processes per node, n_MPI_proc_per_node (for example from your run-script; if you use slurm, the number behind ‘–ntasks-per-node’ is the number of MPI processes per node). Then calculate MEMORY_PER_PROC = mem_per_node / n_MPI_proc_per_node (typically between 2 GB and 50 GB). Unit of keyword: Gigabyte (GB). [Edit on GitHub]

NUM_TIME_FREQ_POINTS: integer = 30

Usage: NUM_TIME_FREQ_POINTS 30

Mentions: ⭐Electronic band structure from GW

Number of discrete points for the imaginary-time grid and the imaginary-frequency grid. The more points, the more precise is the calculation. Typically, 10 points are good for 0.1 eV precision of band structures and molecular energy levels, 20 points for 0.03 eV precision, and 30 points for 0.01 eV precision, see Table I in https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01282. GW computation time increases linearly with NUM_TIME_FREQ_POINTS. [Edit on GitHub]

REGULARIZATION_RI: real = -1.00000000E+000

Usage: REGULARIZATION_RI 1.0E-4

Mentions: ⭐Electronic band structure from GW

Parameter for RI regularization, setting a negative value triggers the default value. Affects RI basis set convergence but in any case large RI basis will give RI basis set convergence. [Edit on GitHub]